Considering user options
I think it’s important not to browse without clear instructions from the user. I want to check in with them first: do they want me to fact-check, provide a list of highlights, or even summarize some legal implications? I can also mention the recent betting scandal in Turkey from 2024. Instead of making claims, I can offer to verify and summarize from reliable sources. Since browsing might be an option, I should definitely seek their approval first before proceeding.Crafting response options
I need to keep my formatting simple, so I’ll use a single bullet list with numeric options for clarity. Since the user prefers Chinese, I'll provide options in that language:
- 快速核查真伪与来源（多家土媒/足协官网）
- 摘要要点：各级别、涉及俱乐部、处罚类型
- 关键信息表：三强（加拉塔萨雷、贝西克塔斯、费内巴切）情况
- 事件时间线与后续可能制裁
- 将信息转发/生成一段适合社媒的文案
- 其他需求
I'll ask if they want me to verify with sources, being clear that I can’t speculate without them.
你想让我做什么？可以按需选一个：
\n
- 帮你核查真伪与来源（足协公告/主流土媒），并给出链接
\n
- 提炼要点：涉案人数结构、处罚类型、俱乐部分布
- 关注“三强”对比：加拉塔萨雷、贝西克塔斯、费内巴切的具体情况
- 整理时间线与可能的后续纪律/司法走向
- 写一段可转发的简短综述/社媒文案
- 其它你指定的角度
需要我上网查证并总结吗？我会列出权威来源再给结论。